https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:15798 Wed 11 Apr 2018 11:09:19 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:49865 Wed 07 Jun 2023 14:30:30 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:44038 Wed 05 Oct 2022 15:25:27 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:50728 Tue 29 Aug 2023 10:49:44 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:44966 Democracy and Tradition, Jeffrey Stout asks Christian political theologians if they can discern God's activity in modern democratic cultures. In so doing they might "acknowledge the sovereignty of God while transcending both resentment of, and absorption into, the secular." As Stout recognizes, the question of sovereignty is relevant not only to Christian, but also Jewish and Islamic thought. However, interreligious comparisons remain undeveloped in his work. In response, the following essay coordinates Stout's pragmatism with developments in comparative theology. It then evaluates both the Jewish messianism of Gershom Scholem alongside Islamic sovereignty (hakimayyah) in the thought of Sayyid Qutb. While their viewpoints differ in considerable respects, they nonetheless provide key test cases for Stout's questions concerning divine sovereignty. In sum, the paper opens new avenues for religious deliberations in democratic traditions.]]> Tue 25 Oct 2022 13:38:27 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:46352 Tue 15 Nov 2022 14:26:58 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:10031 Sat 24 Mar 2018 08:12:18 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:9996 Sat 24 Mar 2018 08:12:15 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:10224 Sat 24 Mar 2018 08:11:28 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:10157 Sat 24 Mar 2018 08:07:28 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:10152 Sat 24 Mar 2018 08:07:26 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:16568 Sat 24 Mar 2018 08:06:48 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:16575 Sat 24 Mar 2018 08:06:47 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:27121 Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:41:35 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:25956 Anti-Judaism: The Western Tradition, demonstrates the history and development of such categories with particular attention to Luther. What goes unnoticed is the ongoing operations of anti-Judaism in later theologians such as Bonhoeffer. Although Bonhoeffer may not have been anti-Semitic, the degree to which his theology remained bound to centuries old anti-Judaism is another matter.]]> Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:41:24 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:25383 Phaedrus and introduce his understanding of writing as différance. I then outline Pickstock's After Writing in order to understand her emphasis on the liturgical nature of Platonic dialogue. Pickstock aims to displace Derrida's embrace of writing by defending the orality of liturgy. As a result, her own theological supplement minimizes the ecclesial role of writing. Further, it is particularly critical of the impact of the printing press on bound codex bibles after the Reformation. It is here that an ambiguity emerges between writing and codex presentation in Pickstock's account. As it happens, this is an ambiguity that Derrida also recognized, asking at one point, why 'all the Christian churches are more mediatic than their Jewish, Moslem, Buddhist, etc. equivalents'. In response, the insights of book historians such as Roger Chartier are brought to bear in order to understand the longer history of the codex, a history which sees the printing press as a continuation of the early transition from roll to codex in the second century of the Common Era. It has long been noted that Christians of this period were early and pervasive adopters of codex binding for their sacred writings. By summarizing the reasons why, it will be shown how the codex expressed early Christian theological concerns. After Pickstock, the codex itself can be understood as faithful repetition.]]> Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:39:11 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:26744 Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:24:49 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:50799 Sat 05 Aug 2023 16:02:43 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:47753 Fri 27 Jan 2023 10:10:55 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:40531 Fri 22 Jul 2022 15:19:27 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:32130 Fri 04 May 2018 11:52:52 AEST ]]>